brightrosefox: (Default)
[personal profile] brightrosefox
I guess I'm late to the party, but I only just heard about LJ's new policy of "flagging" entries that contain Adult Content. Because we must Protect The Precious Children. Or something like that.

I tend to talk about Adult Content. Guess this means I should put a Warning Sign in each entry that contains such content. But I realize that my entries might not just offend certain types of parents, but might offend strangers who just don't want to read about my sex life. And you know what? Fuck them. I'm married. I have sex with my husband. Before we were married, we had sex. It's what people do. I understand that you might not want to read about the details, because I can get creative. But I am more than happy to put everything under a cut. So you don't have to read. The day I stop mentioning it at all is the day my husband himself requests it. But I highly doubt he even cares. He doesn't read or post to LJ that often. And he enjoys knowing that his wife is happy.
I don't talk about graphic details like body parts. I only talk about how I feel, the emotion, the mental aspect. I don't write porn. Sometimes I might gush happily about how he makes me feel amazing. And you know what, if people don't want to know about that, I'm handing out free buckets of brain bleach. Have at it.
It's one thing if my close friends say, "Hey, Jo, I don't wanna hear about you and Adam fucking, please, that's not a mental image I need." I respect that highly. Which is why I use LJ cuts and warnings such as "This post contains an emotional description of how last night's sex made me feel wonderful. Read at your own risk." However, when people I don't even know start bitching at me, that's different. I don't have to change anything for strangers. It's MY journal.
Sex for me is a very beautiful thing. It's healing and magical and lovely. I like talking about it. But I know that there are people who don't like hearing about it. That's fair. That's fine. You know what, you don't have to read those entries. But don't you dare tell me what I can and cannot write about. You don't even know me.

/end rant

Date: 2007-12-10 04:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] la-mia-cara.livejournal.com
I completely agree. This flagging thing is annoying.

By the way, would you feel comfortable if I could read your friends only entries? Because I do enjoy reading your public entries, so I'd really like to be able to read the other ones, too. But if you don't want to add me, of course that's perfectly all right too. Just wondering. :-)

Date: 2007-12-10 04:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brightrosefox.livejournal.com
I actually don't have many friends only posts. :)
If you've found any of my posts that are locked, let me know and I'll friend you so you can read them.

Date: 2007-12-16 12:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] la-mia-cara.livejournal.com
All right, thanks - I'll let you know :-)

Date: 2007-12-10 04:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] greenteadragon.livejournal.com
Amen! Sex is good.

Date: 2007-12-10 04:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sigma7.livejournal.com
I don't write porn.

And yet we keep reading anyway.

Date: 2007-12-10 05:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brightrosefox.livejournal.com
We do, we do. Because, well... it's porn.

Date: 2007-12-10 04:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wolfden.livejournal.com
I really think people should police their own kids.

There's nothing wrong with talking about sex. Sex is good. I like it. :)

Date: 2007-12-10 05:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brightrosefox.livejournal.com
Parents not policing their kids and trying to make everyone else do it is such an annoying thing.

Date: 2007-12-10 05:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] libwitch.livejournal.com
What annoys me about this new LJ policy is that it is just pointless. Kids, who want to keep reading HP Slash, will simply change their ages on their profile. People will keep posting what they want to post, because really, its not like what kids stumble upon on LJ is worse then what they find elsewhere online.

People need to stop trying to babysit children. Its why there are parents.

Date: 2007-12-10 05:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brightrosefox.livejournal.com
It is very pointless. Kids are creative. They find ways. I don't want to be told that I need to censor myself just because a child might read the words "fuck" or "sex" in my journal.

Date: 2007-12-10 05:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gwynethfar.livejournal.com
Wait, what do they mean, "flagging"? Like in football? Are we going to get warned about adult content? I hadn't heard anything about this!

Date: 2007-12-10 05:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brightrosefox.livejournal.com
I think that it means that other users will be able to report if any of your entries (if they're public) contain Content That Is Inappropriate For Children.

Date: 2007-12-10 05:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gwynethfar.livejournal.com
Sigh. Guess my potty mouthed journal is going FO then.

Date: 2007-12-10 05:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brightrosefox.livejournal.com
Actually, maybe not. They changed some things around after enough people yelled at them.

Date: 2007-12-10 05:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brightrosefox.livejournal.com
http://community.livejournal.com/lj_policy/1227.html

Date: 2007-12-10 05:39 pm (UTC)

Date: 2007-12-10 05:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wishkey.livejournal.com
Did someone complain? Who the hell would have that kind of nerve?

Date: 2007-12-10 05:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brightrosefox.livejournal.com
A couple of people did, in my email this morning. I ignored them, because if I'd replied, it would have been very not pretty. Not pretty at all.

Date: 2007-12-10 06:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] amigone.livejournal.com
someone complained about nookie mention in your journal?

It's not like you describe each and every aspect of it. Like you said, it's the emotional end of thing. No likie? Don't read it!

Date: 2007-12-10 06:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brightrosefox.livejournal.com
Mheh. Yeah. Doesn't stop people from whining, which is why I think LJ went on the defensive with this flag thing. Next time you post a new entry, take a look at your "Adult Content" filter where you have comment screening. It's... crazy.

Date: 2007-12-10 08:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wishkey.livejournal.com
There is something wrong with the world we live in when people feel the need to complain about healthy marital sex in a person's self-labeled personal journal, but it's far more accepted to read about or watch sex in any form, healthy or not, in pornography.

It's your journal, you not only should, but DO write what you want. If people don't like it, they can self-edit: shut up and not read any further.

Date: 2007-12-10 09:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brightrosefox.livejournal.com
It gives me tension headaches sometimes.
(Mostly because I keep banging my head on my desk whenever I hear or read about those complaints.

Date: 2007-12-10 08:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fionavere.livejournal.com
Wow, your journal is pretty tame when it comes to teh secks compared to some of the other people I have, or have had friended! (never unfriended anyone over talk of sex btw) That's absolutely ridiculous!

Date: 2007-12-10 09:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brightrosefox.livejournal.com
I'm almost tempted to offer links to the next offended person, directing them to some of the really steamy journals!

Date: 2007-12-10 06:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tufted.livejournal.com
The censorship going on at lj is sending off all kinds of flashing red lights in my brain!

I write for children and teens. The things found in a lot of young adult books make your journal look like Sesame Street!

I can't believe anyone complained about your journal. Insanity.

Date: 2007-12-10 06:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brightrosefox.livejournal.com
No kidding. I've read YA novels that contain as much explicit sex as a Laurell K. Hamilton book.

Date: 2007-12-10 10:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] datajana2007.livejournal.com
Well said!!

*applauds*

Date: 2007-12-11 01:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blood-4-deniro.livejournal.com
i didnt even notice that....hmm...i just think that people shouldnt read something just because it's there. if they get offended by reading about someone's sex life, they shouldnt read it. it's just stupid.

Date: 2007-12-11 02:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fadingmemories.livejournal.com
Wait... so sex is a no go now on private journals?! What did I miss!?!??!

Date: 2007-12-11 03:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brightrosefox.livejournal.com
I'm not clear on the details, but on the LJ front page, there are several news updates about it (I don't even pay attention to those things, but I do now). A new policy where users can flag their own posts as having Adult Content when they post (it's a drop down box under comment screening on the right hand side). And, apparently, if another user sees something "inappropriate" they can flag it as such. It's becoming very unpopular, it seems.

Date: 2007-12-11 08:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] belenen.livejournal.com
People really came to you complaining about what you wrote in your LJ?!?!? That's akin to people coming into your house and complaining about the way you decorate! It makes no sense! I find it ridiculous to the point of ludicrousness.

I really don't understand people's attitude toward sex. Maybe they get exposed to too much nasty stuff that calls itself sex, and they don't know what real sex is like. *shrugs* Whatever the case, telling someone else "ur doin it rong" is not going to do anyone any good!

On the flagging thing, I think it is a good idea in theory but there is too much room for misuse. I don't really care, since my LJ still stays public. If they started forcing me to lock things, THEN I would be pissed.

Date: 2007-12-12 12:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shaula82.livejournal.com
Gah! *flails*


Is it just me, or is LJ getting more and more conservative?

Date: 2007-12-12 12:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shaula82.livejournal.com
By the way, obviously we don't know each other in real life, but I've never read anything in your journal that's been squicky. And I absolutely agree - these are human activities. They shouldn't be demonised or hidden because of...well, I'm not even sure what the reason for it is. Gah.

Date: 2007-12-12 03:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brightrosefox.livejournal.com
Thank you. And I think you're right; LJ does seem to be getting more and more conservative.

Date: 2007-12-20 04:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hilarina.livejournal.com
wow. people are so messed up and brainwashed about sex being dirty, etc. having sex with someone you love is a beautiful and spiritual thing.

Date: 2007-12-20 04:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brightrosefox.livejournal.com
Honestly, it makes me laugh now, because of the news that a 16-year-old celebrity got pregnant (Jamie Lynn Spears), and so many people are saying that they'll never watch her TV show, they've lost all respect for her, etc etc.

Profile

brightrosefox: (Default)
brightlotusmoon

December 2014

S M T W T F S
 1234 56
7 891011 1213
14 15161718 1920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 12th, 2026 03:18 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios