What did the pants do?
May. 13th, 2004 04:51 pmhttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4963512/?GT1=3391
Yes, lawmakers are going to ban young people from wearing low-slung, low-rise pants that look like they could fall off the hips any second. I see both points: On one hand, it is kinda annoying to see people's underwear and buttcracks, and people are still impressionable enough to be swayed by famous actors and singers who wear the pants. Teens might think they need to get in shape and lose weight just to wear the pants, just because their celebrity idol does it.
On the other hand, people should be allowed to wear whatever they want. But of course there are still things to consider.
I keep thinking back to what
shiefox said in response to my post about body image. I think he's right: People are, for the most part, responsible for their thoughts and actions. We see a commercial or a product, we suddenly have a desire to buy or emulate it. We're vulnerable. We're impressionable. These things are out there for us to cry and lament and spend money over because we respond to them. However, the opposite is also true. If we never saw an ad for a particular anti-wrinkle cream or hair gel or a clothing fad, would we even bother? Are we governed by what we see, or by how we see it?
Honestly, I think it's both. Yes, we are totally responsible for our urges, and when we decide to get up and go do these things, buy these products, wear these clothes, we can stop ourselves. We can say no, we're broke, we don't need it. We don't have to stare at the skinny bikini models in magazines; we can get up off our own asses and go do what we need to do.
But really, those commercials and ads do get intrusive, don't they. Sometimes it's very hard to look away from something screaming at you to buy or use. But in the end, we do have a choice. And this new law makes me wonder if freedom of choice is being either abused or restricted in appalling amounts.
I dunno. My mind is subject to change. I'm on the fence about it. Feel free to give opinions.
Yes, lawmakers are going to ban young people from wearing low-slung, low-rise pants that look like they could fall off the hips any second. I see both points: On one hand, it is kinda annoying to see people's underwear and buttcracks, and people are still impressionable enough to be swayed by famous actors and singers who wear the pants. Teens might think they need to get in shape and lose weight just to wear the pants, just because their celebrity idol does it.
On the other hand, people should be allowed to wear whatever they want. But of course there are still things to consider.
I keep thinking back to what
Honestly, I think it's both. Yes, we are totally responsible for our urges, and when we decide to get up and go do these things, buy these products, wear these clothes, we can stop ourselves. We can say no, we're broke, we don't need it. We don't have to stare at the skinny bikini models in magazines; we can get up off our own asses and go do what we need to do.
But really, those commercials and ads do get intrusive, don't they. Sometimes it's very hard to look away from something screaming at you to buy or use. But in the end, we do have a choice. And this new law makes me wonder if freedom of choice is being either abused or restricted in appalling amounts.
I dunno. My mind is subject to change. I'm on the fence about it. Feel free to give opinions.